Spectroscopic follow up of Kepler planet candidates

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Spectroscopic follow up of Kepler planet candidates. / Latham..[et al.], D. W.; Cochran, W. D.; Marcy, G.W.; Buchhave, Lars C. Astrup.

In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 42, 01.02.2010, p. 318-.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Latham..[et al.], DW, Cochran, WD, Marcy, GW & Buchhave, LCA 2010, 'Spectroscopic follow up of Kepler planet candidates', Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 42, pp. 318-.

APA

Latham..[et al.], D. W., Cochran, W. D., Marcy, G. W., & Buchhave, L. C. A. (2010). Spectroscopic follow up of Kepler planet candidates. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 42, 318-.

Vancouver

Latham..[et al.] DW, Cochran WD, Marcy GW, Buchhave LCA. Spectroscopic follow up of Kepler planet candidates. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 2010 Feb 1;42:318-.

Author

Latham..[et al.], D. W. ; Cochran, W. D. ; Marcy, G.W. ; Buchhave, Lars C. Astrup. / Spectroscopic follow up of Kepler planet candidates. In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 2010 ; Vol. 42. pp. 318-.

Bibtex

@article{e585a0d4ffb0453eb8a98314e0a592e5,
title = "Spectroscopic follow up of Kepler planet candidates",
abstract = "Spectroscopic follow-up observations play a crucial role in the confirmation and characterization of transiting planet candidates identified by Kepler. The most challenging part of this work is the determination of radial velocities with a precision approaching 1 m/s in order to derive masses from spectroscopic orbits. The most precious resource for this work is HIRES on Keck I, to be joined by HARPS-North on the William Herschel Telescope when that new spectrometer comes on line in two years. Because a large fraction of the planet candidates are in fact stellar systems involving eclipsing stars and not planets, our strategy is to start with reconnaissance spectroscopy using smaller telescopes, to sort out and reject as many of the false positives as possible before going to Keck. During the first Kepler observing season in 2009, more than 100 nights of telescope time were allocated for this work, using high-resolution spectrometers on the Lick 3.0-m Shane Telescope, the McDonald 2.7-m Reflector, the 2.5-m Nordic Optical Telescope, and the 1.5-m Tillinghast Reflector at the Whipple observatory. In this paper we will summarize the scope and organization of the spectroscopic follow-up observations, showing examples of the types of false positives found and ending with a presentation of the characteristics of a confirmed planet. ",
author = "{Latham..[et al.]}, {D. W.} and Cochran, {W. D.} and G.W. Marcy and Buchhave, {Lars C. Astrup}",
year = "2010",
month = feb,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "318--",
journal = "American Astronomical Society. Bulletin",
issn = "0002-7537",
publisher = "American Astronomical Society",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spectroscopic follow up of Kepler planet candidates

AU - Latham..[et al.], D. W.

AU - Cochran, W. D.

AU - Marcy, G.W.

AU - Buchhave, Lars C. Astrup

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - Spectroscopic follow-up observations play a crucial role in the confirmation and characterization of transiting planet candidates identified by Kepler. The most challenging part of this work is the determination of radial velocities with a precision approaching 1 m/s in order to derive masses from spectroscopic orbits. The most precious resource for this work is HIRES on Keck I, to be joined by HARPS-North on the William Herschel Telescope when that new spectrometer comes on line in two years. Because a large fraction of the planet candidates are in fact stellar systems involving eclipsing stars and not planets, our strategy is to start with reconnaissance spectroscopy using smaller telescopes, to sort out and reject as many of the false positives as possible before going to Keck. During the first Kepler observing season in 2009, more than 100 nights of telescope time were allocated for this work, using high-resolution spectrometers on the Lick 3.0-m Shane Telescope, the McDonald 2.7-m Reflector, the 2.5-m Nordic Optical Telescope, and the 1.5-m Tillinghast Reflector at the Whipple observatory. In this paper we will summarize the scope and organization of the spectroscopic follow-up observations, showing examples of the types of false positives found and ending with a presentation of the characteristics of a confirmed planet.

AB - Spectroscopic follow-up observations play a crucial role in the confirmation and characterization of transiting planet candidates identified by Kepler. The most challenging part of this work is the determination of radial velocities with a precision approaching 1 m/s in order to derive masses from spectroscopic orbits. The most precious resource for this work is HIRES on Keck I, to be joined by HARPS-North on the William Herschel Telescope when that new spectrometer comes on line in two years. Because a large fraction of the planet candidates are in fact stellar systems involving eclipsing stars and not planets, our strategy is to start with reconnaissance spectroscopy using smaller telescopes, to sort out and reject as many of the false positives as possible before going to Keck. During the first Kepler observing season in 2009, more than 100 nights of telescope time were allocated for this work, using high-resolution spectrometers on the Lick 3.0-m Shane Telescope, the McDonald 2.7-m Reflector, the 2.5-m Nordic Optical Telescope, and the 1.5-m Tillinghast Reflector at the Whipple observatory. In this paper we will summarize the scope and organization of the spectroscopic follow-up observations, showing examples of the types of false positives found and ending with a presentation of the characteristics of a confirmed planet.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 318-

JO - American Astronomical Society. Bulletin

JF - American Astronomical Society. Bulletin

SN - 0002-7537

ER -

ID: 32931497